Archive for the ‘policy’ category

Global Network Ambassador Continues to Make the Case for Global Health

February 17th, 2011

Tommy G. Thompson, former Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and former Governor of Wisconsin (1987-2001) spoke out about global health as a key lever in foreign policy on Wednesday in an editorial published by the Huffington Post. Secretary Thompson acknowledges the difficult foreign policy issues facing the 112th Congress and offers up a solution: use health diplomacy to improve international health conditions in order to bolster the U.S. economy and strengthen foreign policy.

He states that health diplomacy involves “winning the hearts and minds of those abroad by strategically exporting medical care and humanitarian aid, building in-country capacity, and providing health education, training and personnel.” By using this deliberately the U.S. can engage in measures to reduce terrorism, increase the number of productive workers, and ultimately “secure our nation’s future and build a strong, stable global community.”

Drawing on his experience, he says: “Health diplomacy must be institutionalized as a critical component of U.S. diplomatic, defense and foreign policy. Global health is not a Republican issue or a Democrat issue. It’s not even exclusively an American issue. It is the moral responsibility and strategic concern of every freedom-loving citizen of the world.”

Governor Thompson has been a Global Network Ambassador since 2008 and a vital voice for NTDs. In August 2008 he traveled throughout Rwanda and joined the Rwandan Ministry of Health in launching their first-ever national deworming campaign. Yesterday’s post follows a 2009 editorial co-authored with Dr. Peter Hotez, president of the Sabin Vaccine Institute in which they examine NTD control as a means of U.S. foreign policy.

Spotlight on 2010 G-FINDER Report

February 16th, 2011

This morning, Kate Kelland of Reuters London, highlights the latest G-FINDER report. The report urges focus on drugs for neglected diseases as advocacy groups are worried that funders are slowly moving away from neglected disease research.  Funding control and elimination programs for neglected diseases will contribute greatly to reaching the U.N’s MDG goals as neglected diseases are often sicknesses of poverty that kill millions of children each year and impede on the quality of life around the world.

“Increased public spending on domestic researchers is an understandable strategy in hard economic times, but only if it achieves the aim of creating new medicines and vaccines for those in the developing world.”

It is often difficult to rally support for neglected disease funding as they are often ignored because they affect mainly poor international communities and do not appear to be a  profitable market for pharmaceutical companies.

However, Mary Moran, a contributing author of the Global Funding of Innovation for Neglected Diseases (G-FINDER) report, emphasized the latest successes from  “product development partnerships (PDPs)” formed between pharmaceutical companies and research groups.  These partnerships are cost-effective and have profitable potential.

» Read more: Spotlight on 2010 G-FINDER Report

Modest Increases Proposed for U.S. Global Health Program Funding

February 15th, 2011

Yesterday, the Obama administration released its budget request for fiscal year 2012. The Administration is proposing a 2% increase towards the Global Health Initiative (GHI), raising their U.S. investment to $9.8 billion. However, despite these increases, John Cohen of ScienceMag posts about the injurious nature of the proposed cuts by the House of Representatives.

“The continuing resolution reductions introduced by the chair of the appropriations committee, Representative Hal Rogers (R-KY), would cut $783.5 million from the main component of GHI, the Global Health and Child Survival effort, which supports treatment and prevention programs for HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), family planning, and nutrition efforts. The continuing resolution would take away another $300 million in contributions to the Global Fund.”

Deep cuts in funding will have a pernicious impact on NTD research and resource mobilization. The FY2010 budget appropriated only $65 million for NTDs. While Obama’s proposed FY11 budget promised to raise that amount to $155 million, the proposed FY12 budget would drop that amount to $100 million. Peter Hotez , President of the Sabin Vaccine Institute, specializes in vaccine development for NTDs. Dr.Hotez expresses that “[NTD control is] such a good buy for public health,” emphasizing that increasing GHI funds would further the United State’s efforts to expand NTD control and elimination programs past the dozen countries the U.S now helps.

The proposed House cuts will be extremely harmful to the well-being of global health. Millions of people would die from preventable diseases due to lack of treatment and access to drugs. According to Helene Gayle, head of CARE USA, “such drastic cuts in GHI funding will contribute to pushing more people around the world in poverty this year, with Africa expected to be the hardest hit.”

Learn more

Global Health and Corruption

January 27th, 2011

By: Alanna Shaikh

It feels like everyone is talking about global health and corruption right now. Rajiv Shah mentioned it explicitly in his recent speech on USAID’s new approach to international development. The Associated press wrote an over the top alarmist article (1) about the Global Fund’s Inspector General uncovering a .03 percent loss of grant money to corruption. CGD put up two blog posts on corruption and global health, which has been followed a by a slew of other bloggers joining in the conversation.

» Read more: Global Health and Corruption