Posts Tagged ‘policy’

Trachoma control community to G8 leaders: Honor commitment to eliminate NTDs

May 26th, 2011

Reposted with permission from International Trachoma Institute.

By: Elizabeth Kurylo

The trachoma control community wants G8 leaders to keep promises they made last year to help control or eliminate Neglected Tropical Diseases.

With an advocacy ad in the official publication, G8 Summit France- 2011, the International Coalition for Trachoma Control (ICTC) is urging leaders of the G8 nations to fulfill their 2010 commitment to  “support the control or elimination of high-burden NTDs.”

The ad, available in English and French, also announces the coming availability of ICTC’s “2020 INSight” plan to finish the job of eliminating blinding trachoma by 2020.

The 2011 G8 summit will be held in Deauville, France, on May 26th and 27th.

The G8 is comprised of the eight main industrialized countries: Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States.

Conditional Cash Transfers – Learning as We Go

March 21st, 2011

By: Richard Skolnik

The use of conditional cash transfers (CCTs) is spreading. Originating in Mexico and Brazil, CCTs are incentive payments that governments make to people to encourage them to engage in selected programs, often in health or education. The payments are “conditional” on people’s participating in those program in an agreed way. CCTs are now used in a number of countries to promote better nutrition, improved health in young children, and safer pregnancy outcomes for mothers and children, among other goals. The evidence suggests that CCTs might be a cost-effective approach to improving a number of health outcomes, especially in settings where there are important social and economic constraints to people’s accessing key health services.

As the use of CCTs expands, I look forward to seeing more research on: the ethics of paying people for making certain choices; how to sustain the behavioral impacts of CCTs; how to pay for them; and how to retain community-based approaches to behavior change when appropriate.

It will be valuable to see more explicit attention paid to ethical issues related to cash incentives for poor people to engage in certain behaviors.  To date, there does not appear to have been a systematic examination of them, either broadly or as they have played out in the CCT programs thus far. Ethicists are working with economists to address these questions and a seminar at Harvard in April on CCTs and ethics is a welcome step. » Read more: Conditional Cash Transfers – Learning as We Go

Global Network Ambassador Continues to Make the Case for Global Health

February 17th, 2011

Tommy G. Thompson, former Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and former Governor of Wisconsin (1987-2001) spoke out about global health as a key lever in foreign policy on Wednesday in an editorial published by the Huffington Post. Secretary Thompson acknowledges the difficult foreign policy issues facing the 112th Congress and offers up a solution: use health diplomacy to improve international health conditions in order to bolster the U.S. economy and strengthen foreign policy.

He states that health diplomacy involves “winning the hearts and minds of those abroad by strategically exporting medical care and humanitarian aid, building in-country capacity, and providing health education, training and personnel.” By using this deliberately the U.S. can engage in measures to reduce terrorism, increase the number of productive workers, and ultimately “secure our nation’s future and build a strong, stable global community.”

Drawing on his experience, he says: “Health diplomacy must be institutionalized as a critical component of U.S. diplomatic, defense and foreign policy. Global health is not a Republican issue or a Democrat issue. It’s not even exclusively an American issue. It is the moral responsibility and strategic concern of every freedom-loving citizen of the world.”

Governor Thompson has been a Global Network Ambassador since 2008 and a vital voice for NTDs. In August 2008 he traveled throughout Rwanda and joined the Rwandan Ministry of Health in launching their first-ever national deworming campaign. Yesterday’s post follows a 2009 editorial co-authored with Dr. Peter Hotez, president of the Sabin Vaccine Institute in which they examine NTD control as a means of U.S. foreign policy.

Modest Increases Proposed for U.S. Global Health Program Funding

February 15th, 2011

Yesterday, the Obama administration released its budget request for fiscal year 2012. The Administration is proposing a 2% increase towards the Global Health Initiative (GHI), raising their U.S. investment to $9.8 billion. However, despite these increases, John Cohen of ScienceMag posts about the injurious nature of the proposed cuts by the House of Representatives.

“The continuing resolution reductions introduced by the chair of the appropriations committee, Representative Hal Rogers (R-KY), would cut $783.5 million from the main component of GHI, the Global Health and Child Survival effort, which supports treatment and prevention programs for HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), family planning, and nutrition efforts. The continuing resolution would take away another $300 million in contributions to the Global Fund.”

Deep cuts in funding will have a pernicious impact on NTD research and resource mobilization. The FY2010 budget appropriated only $65 million for NTDs. While Obama’s proposed FY11 budget promised to raise that amount to $155 million, the proposed FY12 budget would drop that amount to $100 million. Peter Hotez , President of the Sabin Vaccine Institute, specializes in vaccine development for NTDs. Dr.Hotez expresses that “[NTD control is] such a good buy for public health,” emphasizing that increasing GHI funds would further the United State’s efforts to expand NTD control and elimination programs past the dozen countries the U.S now helps.

The proposed House cuts will be extremely harmful to the well-being of global health. Millions of people would die from preventable diseases due to lack of treatment and access to drugs. According to Helene Gayle, head of CARE USA, “such drastic cuts in GHI funding will contribute to pushing more people around the world in poverty this year, with Africa expected to be the hardest hit.”

Learn more