Archive for the ‘policy’ category

USAID Confirms FY 2011 Funding Level for NTDs

August 16th, 2011

USAID has recently confirmed that the fiscal year (FY) 2011 funding level for USAID’s NTD Program will be $77 million. This figure, although below the President’s original FY11 request of $155 million, is a $12 million increase from the program’s FY10 allocation of $65 million. The United States has now collectively appropriated $212 million over a six-year period toward NTD control and elimination programs, building on the generous drug donations from the pharmaceutical industry.  It is unknown what FY12 will bring under the new debt ceiling agreement and whether or not this funding level can be maintained; however, given the current economic climate, it is a huge win in the fight against NTDs!

Addressing NTDs, which began in FY06, is an objective within the Global Health Initiative (GHI), a six-year initiative unveiled by President Obama in May 2009. One of GHI’s eight priority goals is to control and eliminate a number of NTDs by 2015. Specifically, GHI hopes to use cross-sectoral collaborations (partnerships among country governments, donors, and non-governmental organizations) to “reduce the prevalence of seven NTDs by 50 percent among 70 percent of the affected population, contributing to: the elimination of onchocerciasis (river blindness) in Latin America by 2016; the elimination of lymphatic filariasis (elephantiasis) globally by 2020; and the elimination of leprosy.”To learn more about GHI’s funding, check out this comprehensive factsheet.  To learn more about how to end the neglect, click here.


The Solutions that Aren’t (Part 1)

March 16th, 2011

By: Alanna Shaikh

In the past couple of years we’ve faced major reconsideration of two of international development’s biggest miracles: micro-credit and the Green Revolution.[i] They have gone from being seen as world-changing silver bullets to just one more tool in a kind of effective arsenal.

Micro-credit – the extension of small loans to poor people – it seems, doesn’t lift most people out of poverty. Instead, what it does is help poor people to smooth their consumption – spread the cost of major expenditures over time. A loan that pays for a wedding, a home, or medical expenses allows a family to pay in installments slowly, as opposed to being suddenly drained of all their resources. It acts, in fact, in much the same way as micro-savings. Or a credit card, for that matter, and how many people have been lifted out of poverty by a Discover card? It’s a useful tool for money management, and a valuable tool for people who previously had no access to this kind of credit, but it’s not a game-changer. (For more information on micro-finance, I recommend reading anything David Roodman has written in particular this paper and his excellent blog.)

The Green Revolution has faced a similar rethinking. For those of you not familiar with the term, the Green Revolution was “a series of research, development, and technology transfer initiatives, occurring between the 1940s and the late 1970s, that increased agriculture production around the world, beginning most markedly in the late 1960s…The initiatives involved the development of high-yielding varieties of cereal grains, expansion of irrigation infrastructure, modernization of management techniques, distribution of hybridized seeds, synthetic fertilizers, and pesticides to farmers.”

The impact of the Green Revolution was felt primarily in South Asia, with Africa as a lesser beneficiary of the new technology. It has long been seen as one of international development aid’s greatest successes. We broke South Asia’s famine cycle. How do you not count that as a win?

» Read more: The Solutions that Aren’t (Part 1)

GHI Funding Demographics

February 17th, 2011

Graphics taken from www.shawnann.com

Kaiser Family Foundation released new reports examining monetary and demographic data for countries receiving support under the Global Health Initiative (GHI).

“The new analysis evaluates data from FY10 for six programs in the GHI: HIV/AIDS; TB; malaria; maternal, newborn, and child health; family planning and reproductive health; and nutrition. These six program areas, along with health systems and neglected tropical diseases, were identified as the key target areas under the GHI when the $63 billion effort was first announced in 2009.”

The report also incorporates a special spotlight on the  “GHI Plus” countries, which are eight countries selected by the Administration to serve as “learning laboratories.”

Read more!

Global Network Ambassador Continues to Make the Case for Global Health

February 17th, 2011

Tommy G. Thompson, former Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and former Governor of Wisconsin (1987-2001) spoke out about global health as a key lever in foreign policy on Wednesday in an editorial published by the Huffington Post. Secretary Thompson acknowledges the difficult foreign policy issues facing the 112th Congress and offers up a solution: use health diplomacy to improve international health conditions in order to bolster the U.S. economy and strengthen foreign policy.

He states that health diplomacy involves “winning the hearts and minds of those abroad by strategically exporting medical care and humanitarian aid, building in-country capacity, and providing health education, training and personnel.” By using this deliberately the U.S. can engage in measures to reduce terrorism, increase the number of productive workers, and ultimately “secure our nation’s future and build a strong, stable global community.”

Drawing on his experience, he says: “Health diplomacy must be institutionalized as a critical component of U.S. diplomatic, defense and foreign policy. Global health is not a Republican issue or a Democrat issue. It’s not even exclusively an American issue. It is the moral responsibility and strategic concern of every freedom-loving citizen of the world.”

Governor Thompson has been a Global Network Ambassador since 2008 and a vital voice for NTDs. In August 2008 he traveled throughout Rwanda and joined the Rwandan Ministry of Health in launching their first-ever national deworming campaign. Yesterday’s post follows a 2009 editorial co-authored with Dr. Peter Hotez, president of the Sabin Vaccine Institute in which they examine NTD control as a means of U.S. foreign policy.